Doing the Right Thing, Even When No One is Looking

 

Dr. Emrick's Website and Publications

Doing the Right Thing When No One Is Looking

Integrity as an Operating System for Healthcare Leadership: Integrity isn't just a poster on the wall. It's the quiet decision a leader makes when no audit is scheduled, no camera is pointed, and no one is waiting to applaud. In healthcare, where lives depend on small choices repeated at scale, the habit of doing the right thing when no one is watching isn't simply admirable. It is essential. It influences safety, staff morale, financial results, and the trust that keeps patients in our care. Let me give you a couple of scenarios that illustrate the importance of leadership integrity.

First, consider a regional imaging director who inherited a backlog that grew after a software change. The executive's suite wanted monthly improvements, not excuses. During a Friday huddle, the leaders told the team to close incomplete studies in the worklist to "clean the optics," then to "circle back next week" for quality checks that rarely happened. Near-miss reports decreased. Staff learned that raising concerns slowed the machine and drew scrutiny, so they stayed silent. One month later, a patient with a documented contrast allergy received contrast during an add-on CT. The nurse who hesitated to speak up had been scolded two weeks earlier for "slowing throughput." The event triggered a costly cascade: emergency treatment, a family complaint leading to litigation, new staffing to cover departures, and a regulatory review of documentation practices. The final blow wasn't the legal bill. It was the departure of experienced technologists who no longer believed their leaders would protect them if they told uncomfortable truths.

In a second scenario, across town, a medical-surgical nurse caught a near miss involving a high-risk medication at shift change. The unit leader arrived on the floor, thanked the nurse publicly in front of the team, and called the patient and family that evening to disclose the near miss and outline the steps the team would take to prevent it from happening again. The leader convened a learning review on Monday, asked two questions during the following month's huddles, "What feels unsafe today?" and "What made your work hard yesterday?", and moved an earlier pharmacy check in the workflow based on staff input. Reporting increased rather than decreased. Within a quarter, the unit's safety climate scores improved, staff turnover eased, and discharge times for similar patients shortened because rework decreased. Families began commenting on "how coordinated the team felt." That quiet 10 PM call signaled that the organization valued truth over optics, learning over blame, and people over expediency.

These two stories reveal a single fork in the road. When leaders cut corners behind the scenes, teams learn that appearances matter more than ethics. When leaders foster candor and fairness without fanfare, teams see that courage is routine, not heroic. Why does integrity-first leadership produce engaged and high-performing teams? A growing body of peer-reviewed research links everyday leader behavior with workforce engagement, psychological safety, safety climate, and patient outcomes, as well as ethical leadership and performance. Studies in nursing environments show that ethical leadership predicts better job performance and reduces harmful workplace dynamics such as bullying and burnout. It also correlates with lower intentions to leave the organization. These effects matter in a field with labor shortages, where retaining experienced clinicians ensures continuity, quality, and financial stability, as well as psychological safety and patient safety. A 2025 systematic review found multiple studies connecting psychological safety, the belief that it is safe to speak up, ask for help, or admit errors, to concrete patient safety outcomes, including lower event rates and improved reporting. Although this body of work is methodologically diverse, the pattern is consistent: when staff can raise concerns without fear, patients benefit. Third, speaking up on climate acts as a performance lever. Recent research indicates that a "speaking-up" climate improves safety and quality partly by enhancing situation monitoring and teamwork. The pathway is straightforward: more voices, earlier warnings, better anticipation, fewer surprises. Fourth, fairness and retention. Perceptions of organizational justice, including distributive, procedural, and interactional aspects, reduce turnover intentions among healthcare workers. Fair processes and consistent explanations carry as much weight as outcomes because they signal respect. Retention is not only a human victory; it protects quality and lowers the cost of temporary staffing. Finally, but no less critical, a strong safety climate correlates with better nursing safety practices and perceptions of care quality, reinforcing that culture is not "soft." It is measurable and tied to how reliably staff follow standards at 3 AM, not only during surveys.

Taken together, the evidence depicts integrity as a system property, not just a trait belonging to a charismatic individual. Ethical leadership fosters fairness, which in turn invites voice. Voice promotes psychological safety, strengthening teamwork and the overall safety climate. A favorable safety climate improves adherence to standards and consistency of care. This cycle then influences morale, as staff prefer working environments where their daily stories align with the data. The hidden costs of cutting corners and the compounding benefits of candor can lead to toxic cultures. In the first scenario, the story results in both visible and invisible losses. Visible losses include incident fallout, turnover, and damage to reputation with regulators and payers. Invisible losses involve signal blindness, marked by fewer near-miss reports, fewer ideas for improvement, and slower learning across units. In high-acuity services, this blindness increases risk in ways that are not easily measured. In the second scenario, leaders foster compounding returns. Trust enables everyday friction to be openly discussed. When friction becomes discussable, processes become fixable. Better processes restore time, which teams reinvest in patient education, discharge planning, and pre-procedure checks. These micro-investments may seem small alone, but they are crucial overall. They improve patient experience scores, reduce readmissions, and stabilize labor needs. Over time, the unit begins to appear "luckier," but it's not luck; it's governance.

So, what type of habits can leaders implement that put integrity to work, and which leaders must build their leadership framework around, since leaders do not need to wait for a crisis to demonstrate what they value? The following habits move integrity from aspiration to muscle memory. First, make "truth before optics" a weekly habit. At the start of each week, review one metric you might be tempted to "tidy." If the number initially looks worse before improving, share the baseline and your plan. Publicly defend the person who presented the inconvenient data. Over time, this reduces the urge to hide the truth and speeds up learning. Second, hold learning reviews that distinguish harm from blame. Use a structured approach that asks "what conditions made this error more likely?" instead of "who slipped?" Invite frontline staff to redesign their work. Track the number of improvement ideas generated and the number implemented. Third, during every huddle, ask two questions: "What feels unsafe today?" and "What got in your way yesterday?" Then, address at least one minor issue within 24–72 hours, and demonstrate respect through your actions. When staff see their suggestions lead to real change, speaking up becomes routine rather than rare. This creates a culture where voicing concerns improves safety and quality. Fourth, link fairness to the process, not to individual personalities. Post visuals showing how shifts rotate, how schedule preferences are respected, and how professional development funds are allocated. Follow these rules even when it's challenging. Consistent application fosters procedural justice, which in turn predicts lower intentions to leave. Fifth, be truthful first about harm and near-harm incidents. Contact patients and families early. Explain what happened, what you have learned, and what will change. Follow up with a written summary. This upholds honesty and, more importantly, shows respect to those you serve.

So you might wonder what changes when integrity leads. When leaders practice these habits out of sight, teams come to expect honesty rather than fear it. Reporting increases without a rise in actual harm because people raise issues early on. Unit-level experimentation expands because staff trust that leadership will support reasonable change tests. Metrics trend in ways that benefit the mission and margins: fewer adverse events, more stable staffing, less dependency on the agency, fewer last-minute cancellations, more predictable turnarounds, and improved experience scores. There is also a shift in identity that helps retain talent. People want to tell a consistent story about their work. They want to say, "We tell the truth here, even when it stings, and we fix things fast." Integrity makes that story possible on both good and bad days. Leaders who live this way when no one is watching deserve less credit for speeches meant to motivate and more credit for cultivating a culture where doing the right thing becomes the default.