Government Jobs and the Economy: What's the Real Story?

 

Dr. Emrick's Books, Blogs, and Podcasts

Ever wonder if more government jobs actually mean a stronger economy? It’s a fair question, especially when you hear folks cheer about rising government employment as if it’s a clear win for the country. But the truth isn’t so straightforward. Let me explain this fallacy in straightforward terms and see what is really going on. The economy’s health is often measured by something called Gross Domestic Product, or GDP. Think of GDP as a giant tally of everything we produce, goods like cars and services like haircuts, all added up by their market value. When someone gets a government job, their salary gets counted in that tally, which makes it look like the economy’s growing. But here’s the catch: most government work isn’t sold on the open market. Unlike a company making widgets, we don’t know its true value, so we just guess it’s worth whatever we pay the workers. That’s a bit like saying your savings are up because you spent more—it doesn’t mean you’re actually richer.

Why are bigger government payrolls misleading? So, why doesn’t piling on government jobs automatically boost the economy? Picture this: the government and private businesses are both fishing in the same talent pool. If the government offers cushier pay or rock-solid job security, they might reel in workers who’d otherwise be at companies inventing new tech or building homes. That can quietly shrink the economy’s potential, even if the government’s payroll numbers look impressive. Research backs this up in a big way. Studies show that a modest government workforce is great; it keeps the roads paved and the schools running. But there’s a tipping point. Add too many jobs, and it’s like over-salting your soup—it starts to taste worse. Resources get stretched thin, taxes creep up, and the economy slows down. Plus, government agencies don’t face the same make-or-break pressure as businesses. Their payrolls can balloon for various reasons, such as political favors and quick fixes during a crisis, without making the economy more productive.

Let’s look at what the experts have found. One study suggests that while lots of government jobs can smooth out the economy’s wild swings, they also weaken the ripple effect of private hiring. It’s like the government’s just swapping seats with private workers instead of adding more to the table. Another look at the COVID-19 mess showed something similar. When state taxes decreased, governments failed to slash jobs while the economy tanked, but the economy’s real pain came from private businesses hitting the brakes, not from those in the public sector. That hints that government payrolls weren’t the growth engines we might think. There’s even high-tech modeling—fancy simulations, if you will—that shows how government jobs can throw things off. If hiring keeps chugging along no matter what the economy’s doing, it can pull workers away from market-driven gigs and actually make booms and busts bumpier, not calmer. It’s a global lesson, and it applies here, too.

Take 2023, for example. The U.S. added about 709,000 government jobs that year—the biggest jump in over 50 years. Sounds like a party, right? But real GDP growth in 2024 was just 2.8%, down from 2.9% the year before and nowhere near the post-pandemic bounce of 2021. If government jobs were a golden ticket, you’d expect GDP to soar, but it didn’t. Those new hires mostly got paid through the increase of federal deficits, borrowing more through the treasury to pay for this job’s growth, ultimately leading to higher taxes and deficits. The Government Accountability Office is already waving a red flag, saying federal debt could top 100% of the GDP by 2027. The IMF agrees, warning that these deficits could jack up interest rates and squeeze out private investment. Basically, we’re borrowing from tomorrow to fund today’s jobs. Zoom out a bit. From March 1995 to March 2025, government jobs grew by 23%—that’s 4.4 million new positions, from 19.1 million to 23.6 million. But here’s the rub: about three-quarters of those jobs don’t directly pump value into the economy. More people on the government dime also means higher taxes or deeper debt down the line. So, while it might look like a lifeline for unemployment, this growth can actually weigh the economy down, not lift it up.

The bottom line is this. Don’t get me wrong; government jobs have their place. They keep society running and can steady the ship when storms hit. But they’re not a cure-all for economic growth. Lean too hard on them, and you risk crowding out private innovation, piling up debt, and even making economic waves rougher. Next time someone says more government jobs equal a thriving economy, take it with a grain of salt. Some economists have raised concerns about governmental job growth and say a 30% reduction in government job rolls is needed to provide a better balance in spending. This is one worth thinking about.