The Case for Radiology Research, Even When Budgets Are Tight

 

Dr. Emrick's Books, Blogs, and Podcasts

The Case for Radiology Research, Even When Budgets Are Tight

Radiology's magic happens when scientists and clinicians together perform the art of peering into the body with minimal disruption. This magic doesn't just happen; it's built on years of not only scholarly research and discovery but also, and very importantly, funding. Right now, in 2025, we're at a crossroads. Funding for radiology research is becoming more problematic because of changes in NIH grants and competing interests that are trying to work their way into the federal budget. Radiology is a defined field by discovery. Think about the radiology researcher, who spent years learning how to make MRI scans clearer and faster, so that when 10-year-old Timmy was put into an MRI, he was able to get a diagnosis in minutes, not days. Rigorous clinical research has fueled the leaps from CT scans to the refinements being made with MRI. And the innovation doesn't happen in a vacuum. That's why budget cuts at a time of low growth are dangerous.

Consider Sarah, a 45-year-old teacher who has discovered a lump in her breast. Ten years ago, she would have had to undergo significant amounts of surgery just to find out whether or not she had breast cancer. Today, because of the efforts of researchers, a much simpler procedure (or set of imaging procedures) can determine if the lump is something to worry about. Clinical research has led not just to several kinds of "better" imaging (which we don't have to describe here), but also to several "better" ways of interpreting the images and a few new goodies in imaging physics that have improved our ability to use the images we already get. Radiology research is doing good for the lives of patients. Overall, it's pretty clear that the power of research to improve imaging efficiency and accuracy (and to reduce unnecessary, risky, and expensive imaging) is having a salutary effect on the lives of patients.

Clinical research isn't merely about discovery; it's about education. It serves as the training ground for the next generation of radiologists, promoting critical thinking and a profound comprehension of evidence-based practice. Absent research opportunities, we risk creating a lack of innovators, radiologists who can carry out necessary tasks but seem ill-equipped to challenge the status quo and expand the limits of what's possible. Think ahead to a time when a single scan can find cancer before there's any outward sign of it. That's not a scene from a speculative novel; that's what the next frontier of radiology looks like, and it's only maintainable via unfettered research. Take 3D mammography, for example. Unlike traditional mammograms, which take pictures of the breast from one angle, a 3D mammogram captures images of the breast from multiple angles. That allows a radiologist to see the breast in a series of thin slices (which is how your doctor reads it, if he or she is using a human rather than a supercomputer). The slices can be viewed two ways: one after the other, as in a continuous strip, or all at once. And when viewed all at once, the user can easily see the kind of pathology—that is, the changes to your normal breast tissue—that might suggest breast cancer.

We need the facts to make certain every decision is correct. In radiology, evidence-based practice is the gold standard. Clinical research provides the data that underpins every guideline, every protocol, and every decision made in the reading room. For instance, research fuels the optimal imaging intervals for certain cancers, ensuring that timely care is delivered without unnecessary amounts of radiation. If the research engine were to stall, these guidelines would go stale, and there we would be, on the very cutting edge of poor patient care.

I get it; money is tight. But cutting research is like turning off the lights in the lab. We can’t afford to go dark. We need to invest in the future for the sake of every patient who will walk through those hospital doors. Clinical research in radiology is not an optional add-on; it is the foundation for better care. Policymakers, healthcare administrators, and funding bodies must recognize that every dollar invested in research today is a down payment on a healthier, more efficient tomorrow. The cost of inaction is far greater than the cost of investment. Without research, we condemn ourselves to a future of stagnation, where patients pay the price for our shortsightedness. The future of radiology and the patients who depend on it deserve nothing less.