Click: Books, Blogs, and Podcasts
The academic radiology workforce has
faced significant changes over the past decade, with increasing workforce
pressures, faculty recruitment challenges, and shifts in employment trends.
According to a study by Malhotra et al. (2025), the trends in part-time
academic radiology faculty across gender and rank highlight a notable decline
in part-time faculty and the potential implications for academic institutions. The
authors raise concerns that academic practices may be losing faculty to more
flexible employment opportunities in non-academic settings, which could impact
the future sustainability of academic radiology departments. While previous
workforce surveys have reported on part-time hires in radiology broadly,
Malhotra et al. (2025) aimed to understand the following underlying factors better:
- Quantify the proportion of part-time academic
radiology faculty across different ranks.
- Examine gender disparities in part-time employment.
- Evaluate whether the proportion of part-time faculty
has changed over the past decade.
- Discuss potential reasons for declining part-time
employment in academic radiology.
A critical
motivation for the study was prior research suggesting that
radiologists—particularly women—were more likely to seek part-time positions.
However, given the unique pressures in academia, it remained unclear whether
similar trends applied to academic radiology faculty. The study utilized data
from the AAMC Faculty Roster, a comprehensive national database of faculty
members at Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME)--accredited U.S.
medical schools. Using the Faculty Administrative Management Online User System
(FAMOUS) tool, the researchers retrieved annual data from 2015 to 2024 on both
full-time and part-time academic radiology faculty on the clinical educator
track. The analysis focused on: a) Year-wise counts of full-time and part-time
faculty by gender. b) Trends in the proportion of part-time faculty at
different professorial ranks (assistant, associate, full professor). c) Annual
growth rates and linear regression modeling to assess whether part-time
employment declined statistically significantly. The results indicate a
substantial decline in part-time academic radiology faculty, with notable
gender differences. Here are several notable discoveries from the study.
Decline in Part-Time
Faculty: The number of full-time academic radiology faculty increased from
3,276 in 2015 to 4,515 in 2024 (+3.6% annually). a) In contrast, part-time
faculty decreased from 234 in 2015 to 84 in 2024 (-10.8% annually). b)This
decline in part-time faculty began before the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting
that external workforce stressors were not the sole cause. Although, prior
part-time faculty may have converted to full-time employment. Which is not
clear from the study.
Gender Disparities
in Part-Time Employment: a) Women consistently had higher part-time employment
rates than men at the assistant and associate professor levels. b) The
proportion of part-time women decreased from 10% (116/1134) in 2015 to 3%
(47/1497) in 2024. c)The proportion of part-time men decreased from 5%
(118/2376) in 2015 to 1% (37/3102) in 2024. d) At the whole professor level, no
statistically significant gender difference was found in part-time employment.
Differences Across
Faculty Ranks: a) Assistant Professors: Women had higher part-time
representation than men (e.g., 33 vs. 16 in 2023). b) Associate Professors:
Women also had a higher proportion than men. c) Full Professors: The number of
part-time men was slightly higher than part-time women in later years, but the
overall part-time numbers were minimal.
Competitive
Workforce Pressures: a) Academic radiology faculty had significantly lower
rates of part-time employment than private radiology practices. b) The study
authors suggest that academic institutions may lose radiologists to more
flexible non-academic competitors, particularly private practice settings that
offer more adaptable work schedules. The decline in part-time faculty in
academic radiology may stem from several factors:
- Reduced availability of part-time positions due to
increased clinical demands.
- Retention challenges as part-time faculty may
transition to full-time roles or leave academia for private practice.
- Gendered expectations in work-life balance, with women
historically seeking part-time roles at higher rates.
- COVID-19 and post-pandemic restructuring may have led
institutions to consolidate positions and reduce part-time roles.
A significant
concern raised by the study is that academic institutions may struggle to
retain radiologists if they cannot provide flexible work arrangements. Previous
workforce surveys have shown that: a) 16% of radiologists worked part-time in
2018, a rate that has remained stable since 2014. b) 27% of women radiologists
worked part-time in 2014, compared to 9% of men. c) Only 3% of radiologists in
academic settings were hired for part-time work in 2021. This suggests that
while demand for part-time work remains, academic institutions offer fewer
part-time opportunities than private practices, which could drive faculty
attrition.
To address these
challenges, academic radiology departments may need to: a) Re-evaluate faculty
retention strategies by offering more flexible work arrangements. b) Increase
part-time opportunities to accommodate faculty who prioritize work-life
balance. c) Develop structured career pathways that provide clear promotion and
tenure options. d) Monitor gender disparities to ensure equitable access to
part-time positions at all ranks. The study provides critical insights into the
declining trend of part-time faculty, but further research is needed to
explore: a) Longitudinal career trajectories of part-time academic
radiologists. b) Reasons behind faculty decisions to transition to private
practice. c) Institutional policies on part-time employment and their impact on
faculty retention. d) Potential interventions to make academic radiology more
competitive in retaining top talent.
So, what are my conclusions from the
study? First, the findings of this study highlight a significant decline in
part-time academic radiology faculty over the past decade, with gender
disparities persisting in junior ranks. Women, who were historically more
likely to work part-time, have seen their representation in part-time academic
positions decline sharply. Second, given that academic practices offer fewer
part-time opportunities than private practice, there is growing concern that
radiologists seeking flexible work arrangements may leave academia altogether.
Third, academic radiology departments must reconsider their approach to
part-time employment to remain competitive in faculty recruitment and retention.
More flexible work options could help sustain a diverse and robust academic
workforce while ensuring that radiology faculty do not migrate
disproportionately to private-sector opportunities.
References
Malhotra, A., Futela, D., Gandhi, D. S., Wu, X., Payabvash,
S., Wintermark, M., & Duszak, R. (2025). Trends in proportion of part-time
academic radiology faculty by gender and rank [Pre-proof]. Journal of the
American College of Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2025.02.001
Comments
Post a Comment